RegrowProtocol

Evidence-based hair loss reference

Hair loss, without the sales pitch.

79 guides compiled from peer-reviewed medical literature, every claim cited so you can check it yourself. No products to sell you, no consultation to book — just what the studies actually found, including where they found nothing.

79guides
92papers cited
7tools, no email required
0products for sale

Start with what brought you here

I am shedding a lot right now Count what came out and see it against the published normal range. Check a shed count My hairline is moving back A maturing hairline and early balding look alike. There is a documented way to tell. Tell them apart Does this treatment actually work What the trials measured, side by side, with the numbers and their sources. Compare the evidence Which tests should I ask for The blood panel the literature supports, and what each result would mean. See the panel

Each tool shows the sentence and the article code behind every number it prints. Nothing you enter leaves your browser.

Browse by subject

10 guides

Conditions

What is actually causing the shedding — and how each type behaves.

9 guides

Diagnosis & Testing

How hair loss is identified, which blood tests matter, and when to see a doctor.

10 guides

Oral Treatments

The prescription medicines, what the trials measured, and what they cost you.

10 guides

Topicals

Minoxidil and everything applied to the scalp, ranked by evidence.

10 guides

Procedures & Devices

Transplants, PRP, lasers and microneedling — what the studies actually show.

10 guides

Scalp Health

The skin the hair grows out of, and the conditions that damage it.

10 guides

Diet & Lifestyle

Where nutrition genuinely matters, and where the supplement aisle is selling you nothing.

10 guides

Women's Hair Loss

Female pattern loss, postpartum shedding, menopause, PCOS and iron.

The ones most people need first

What this is

Every guide here is between two and four thousand words, ends with its sources, and links to the trials it draws on — 92 distinct papers across 234,000 words, each citation a live link to the paper itself rather than a name in a list. Where the evidence is weak — and in this field it often is — the guides say so rather than filling the gap with confidence.

It is written to be checked. If a number here disagrees with the paper it cites, the paper is right and we want to know. How we write sets out the method, the limits, and who is behind it.